No Police Visible Outside Homes of Justices Roberts and Kavanaugh

MARYLAND—At least two Supreme Court justices still have no visible police protection outside their homes, even after threats of additional protests.

On May 9, more than 100 protesters marched and demonstrated outside the residences of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justice Samuel Alito.

They chanted slogans including “Abort the Court.”

The protests were in response to a leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that suggests the court is planning to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Outside the Supreme Court earlier this week, protesters have also demonstrated hostility toward Kavanaugh, chanting “[Expletive] Kavanaugh.”

According to online pages, protests outside the houses of Supreme Court justices are scheduled for today.

Pro-abortion activist group Ruth Sent Us announced a “Walk-by Wednesday” protest outside the houses of the six conservative Supreme Court justices.

Previously, Ruth Sent Us published a Google map containing the locations of each conservative Supreme Court justice’s residence.

Google has since taken down the map.

“If you’d like to join or lead a peaceful protest, let us know,” the activist group’s website reads.

Protests outside the houses of judges that interfere with them executing their duty are likely illegal.

Federal law states that picketing or parading to influence judges or jurors can be punished with up to a year’s imprisonment.

However, the Department of Justice has yet to announce what it will do in response to the continuing protests.

At 10 a.m., no police stood outside Kavanaugh’s and Roberts’ Maryland residences.

Moreover, no police cars, uniformed security, or other security measures were visible.

Currently, Congress is working to rapidly pass the Supreme Court Police Parity Act, which would give Supreme Court justices 24-hour security for their families.

Pro-abortion activists protesting
Pro-abortion activists protesting
Pro-abortion activists protest outside the house of U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh in Chevy Chase, Md., on Sept. 13, 2021. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The act unanimously passed the Senate on May 9. It still needs to pass the House and be signed by the president to become law.

Several congressmen have said that Supreme Court justices might prove vulnerable to intimidation.

Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) said that the leak leaves justices vulnerable to pressure from protests.

“The Supreme Court leak will set a disturbing precedent of inciting mob pressure to intimidate the justices before they issue a decision,” he said on Twitter. “For the sake of the court’s independence, this leaker must be found and punished.”

According to Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), concerns over the protests outside the homes of justices are exaggerated.

“It is a little hard for me to take the hand-wringing about non-violent protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices seriously when the Supreme Court itself ruled protests outside the homes of ‘doctors who provide abortions’ is protected by the First Amendment,” she said on Twitter.

On May 6, Justice Clarence Thomas announced that the court will not be influenced by activism.

“We can’t be an institution that can be bullied into giving you just the outcomes you want. The events from earlier this week are a symptom of that,” he said.

Although there’s no visible standing protective presence outside of Roberts’ house or Kavanaugh’s house, police may be close by.

A patrol car passed the Roberts residence at 11:01 a.m.

Jackson Elliott


Jackson Elliott reports on small-town America for The Epoch Times. He learned to write and seek truth at Northwestern University. He believes that the most important actions are small and that as Dostoevsky says, everyone is responsible for everyone and for everything. When he isn’t writing, he enjoys running, reading, and spending time with friends. Contact Jackson by emailing

Original News Source Link

Leave a Comment