GOP Files Emergency Motion to Block Voting Without Proof of Citizenship for 2024 Race

The Republican National Committee (RNC) and members of Arizona’s Legislature filed a motion July 1 to stay a federal court order to block certain voters who registered with a federal voter registration form from voting for president in the November elections.

RNC Chairman Michael Whatley said in a news release that the emergency motion was filed because the RNC believes “noncitizen voting compromises our elections and we are committed to stopping it.”

At issue is an Arizona election law that was passed in 2022. HB 2492 made it legal to require proof of citizenship to partake in elections in Arizona. A second 2022 law, HB 2243, which mandated the reporting of the number of voters in the state who didn’t list the status of their citizenship, has also been challenged.

Voting rights groups filed lawsuits against both measures, and U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton found that parts of the legislation circumvented federal voting laws, although other portions of the two laws were upheld.

One of the groups that filed the lawsuit, Campaign Legal, described the two provisions as “discriminatory” and claimed that one “denied the freedom to vote to Arizonans who did not list their birthplace on the state registration form,” and the other requires “county officials to investigate naturalized Arizonans’ citizenship status without good cause.”

Earlier this year, Judge Bolton concluded Arizona legislators did not discriminate when they adopted the two laws and the state does have an interest in preventing voter fraud and limiting voting to those individuals eligible to vote.

Related Stories

They argued, in part, that portions of the law that Judge Bolton had blocked should be kept in place during the ongoing appeal process because it would impact the upcoming presidential election.

“The district court did not engage with the Constitution’s text because it thought that it was bound by precedent. But no court has decided this issue. The Supreme Court has never held that Congress possesses power to regulate the ‘Places and Manner’ of presidential elections,” read a portion of their motion.

And, it added, “If the district court erred in interdicting the implementation of voter registration reforms adopted nearly two years ago (and it did),” a statute known as the Purcell principle, which established that courts shouldn’t change voting or election rules too close to an election in order to avoid confusion for voters, “neither requires nor licenses this Court to compound the federal judiciary’s mistaken incursion into Arizona’s democratic process.”

Mr. Whatley said U.S. elections “should be decided by Americans.”

Arizona’s GOP chair, Gina Swoboda, added that “any vote cast by a non-citizen dilutes those votes and risks silencing those voices,” arguing, “This is a very real problem in Arizona, and we are committed to resolving it.”

Democratic Secretary of State Adrian Fontes had asked the court to deny the RNC’s request and allow portions of that law to remain blocked by Judge Bolton because it’s too close to the election.

“Election officials across Arizona are preparing for what is expected to be a very active 2024 election cycle,” Mr. Fontes’ office wrote to the court.

In her March decision, Judge Bolton wrote that other parts of the laws that require counties to verify voters’ registration status if they haven’t provided proof of U.S. citizenship can be kept. She also ruled that a portion that requires cross-checking voter registration information with government databases can be kept intact.

At the time, Judge Bolton wrote that “considering the evidence as a whole, the court concludes that Arizona’s interests in preventing non-citizens from voting and promoting public confidence in Arizona’s elections outweighs the limited burden voters might encounter when required to provide” documentary proof of citizenship.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.