Evidence is mounting that US public health officials intentionally misled the public regarding source of COVID-19.
WASHINGTONâHouse Select Subcommittee on Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) is opening an investigation of official emails, text messages, and related documents about alleged efforts âat the highest levels of NIH and NIAID to avoid public transparencyâ about the origins of COVID-19.
The NIH is the National Institutes of Health, and the NIAID is the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is part of the NIH. The coronavirus, which originated in China, has killed more than 1.2 million Americans since January 2020.
âDr. Morens went so far as to write in one email âi learned from our foia lady here how to make emails disappear,ââ Mr. Wenstrup said. âThe documents also show that Dr. Morens gave his âbest friendâ and controversial NIH grant recipient, EcoHealth Alliance Inc.(EcoHealth) President Dr. Peter Daszak, preferential treatment by forwarding him potentially damaging FOIA productions prior to public release.â
The select subcommittee chairman also pointed to emails from Greg Folkers, former chief of staff to Dr. Fauci at NIAID and others, in which Mr. Folkers described being told by the NIH FOIA office that misspelled words can evade document searches based on key terms.
In a June 4, 2021, Folkers email, âEcoHealthâ is spelled âEc-Health.â EcoHealth refers to the EcoHealth Alliance, the New York-based nonprofit that channeled funds received from NIH to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
âThis evasion tactic ensures that when the NIH searches its email server for keywords that are responsive to a FOIA request, Mr. Folkersâs emails that contain the misspelled keyword are not identified or produced as a responsive document,â Mr. Wenstrup said.
âIf what appears in these documents is true, this is an apparent attack on public trust and must be met with swift enforcement and consequences for those involved.â
An NIH spokesman didnât respond to The Epoch Timesâ request for comment on the subcommitteeâs actions. A spokesman for the NIH FOIA office couldnât be reached for comment. Mr. Folkers didnât respond to a request for comment.
For more than a year, the select subcommittee has sought extensive documentation of NIH and NIAID knowledge concerning the origins of COVID-19. Congressional investigators have repeatedly had to issue subpoenas to obtain the requested documentation.
Leading officials in NIH, NIAID, and elsewhere in the federal government, including Dr. Fauci most prominently, have insisted the virus most likely migrated to humans from bats via a fish market in Wuhan, China.
![Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Chairman Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) speaks to reporters during a break from a meeting with Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), who was testifying before the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic in Washington on Jan. 8, 2024. (Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times)](https://www.theepochtimes.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.theepochtimes.com%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2024%2F05%2F09%2Fid5647220-01082024-DSC06293-Brad-WenstrupKO-1200x800.jpg&w=1200&q=75)
However, legions of public health and private medicine experts have disputed such an origin, contending the evidence within the virus itself and extensive government documentation indicate a leak from the WIV as the most likely source.
Of those exemptions, federal officials most frequently cite the ones covering national security, ongoing law enforcement investigations, personal privacy, and protection of commercial secrets.
Exemption Five, which enables federal officials to withhold documents created prior to a government decision, is the most frequently cited of the nine and is known informally among many advocates for transparency and accountability as the âwithhold it because you want toâ exemption.
âI started doing public interest work in 1987. This is the worst federal agency stonewalling I have ever seen,â Mr. Rogers said. âNIHâs FOIA evasion serves the American people poorly and raises still more questions about what it was hiding and why.â
He lauded the select subcommittee for âdoing a great job,â saying: âIt is just starting to obtain and make public some evidence about how NIH evaded FOIA requests about COVID origins. It is hard to give a fuller sense of it all without all of the evidence that the select subcommittee is obtaining.â
Another transparency advocate, Open the Books founder and President Adam Andrzejewski, told The Epoch Times that his group is currently involved in six federal lawsuits seeking to force NIH to comply with FOIA disclosure requirements.
âNIH treats every freedom of information request as World War III,â he said. “Hereâs the stonewalling strategy NIH uses to obfuscate federal open records law. First, they ignore the request, which forces federal litigation.
âWhen they lose, NIH blanks out and heavily redacts the documentsâmaking the production virtually worthless. Then, we go back to court to get an order to un-redact the redactions. The entire process takes hundreds of thousands of dollars and years to complete.
âThis pattern of behavior goes beyond privacy concerns or agency mismanagement; it illustrates the contempt for transparency that we finally saw explicitly in Dr. Morensâs emails.â
Original News Source Link – Epoch Times
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!