A bipartisan measure addressing the FAFSA fiasco is cleared for passage before yearâs end, while Democrats say âwait until next yearâ for the other two.
The House Rules Committee has advanced three proposed bills to the floor, with one measure installing a âhardâ Oct. 1 annual deadline for federal college assistance applications.
Two other measuresâa geothermal land-use bill and a proposal to make copper a critical mineralâdrew âwait until next yearâ responses from Democrats, who will be minorities in both chambers when the 119th Congress is sworn in on Jan. 3, 2025.
For now, Republicans are still the minority in the Senate, non-panelist Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) reminded the committee while testifying.
âThereâs still time to do some serious work,â he said. âThese two bills are not serious. They have no chance of being approved by the Senate and becoming law and should not be coming to the floor.â
Rules Committee Chair Rep. Michael Burgess (R-Texas) said Republicans wonât be accepting advice from Democrats about how to proceed during the lame-duck session.
âThe bottom line,â he said, âAmericans have placed their faith in Republicans, and that faith is not something we take lightly. As we look ahead, House Republicans will still use the time before us to improve and right-size the federal government.â
Advancing The FAFSA Deadline Act could be an example of how lawmakers can âstill use the timeâ before them to adopt needed legislation, he said.
Introduced by Rep. Erin Houchin (R-Ind.), the bill addresses a litany of mistakes plaguing Department of Education efforts to implement 2019 and 2020 laws that were designed to simplify and speed the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) system that millions of Americans rely on to defray college costs.
Delays and glitches have fostered mass confusion, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) testified, noting that FAFSA deadlines for the next academic year traditionally begin in October but have been delayed the past two years until December. The bill requires the Education Department to launch FAFSA on Oct. 1.
She said a Government Accountability Office (GAO) survey found that FAFSA applications took an average of 9 1/2days to com plete âin contrast to the administrationâs claim of 15 to 20 minutes.â
The same survey found that the Education Department didnât respond to 4 million FAFSA-related phone calls during the 2023â24 academic year, Foxx said.
âAs a result, hundreds of thousands of students may never enter post-secondary education,â she said, adding that GAO found that 430,000 fewer students submitted 2024â25 FAFSAs âwith the decline most pronounced among low-income students this fall semester. … Some will inevitably put education on the back burner for life. Thatâs what troubles me the most.â
âThe BidenâHarris administration spent more time pursuing an illegal student loan scheme than adhering to critical, congressionally mandated FAFSA deadlines,â Burgess said. âAs the White House delays, prospective students and their families are left in the dark with a looming financial decision. [The bill] delivers much-needed clarity.â
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) called the measure âa pragmatic solution to ensure student aid reaches those who need it.â
Rep. David Scott (D-Ga.) acknowledged that ârolling out this yearâs form … was a mess.â
âI think we all agree. Weâre trying to fix it for next year. Well, I pray we can,â he said.
Cool Reception for HEATS Act
The Harnessing Energy at Thermal Sources Act, or HEATS Act, exempts some geothermal drilling proposals from review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).
Geothermal exploration and production on non-federal lands that contain less than 50 percent of federal subsurface estate would not need a federal drilling permit if approved by local and state governments under the measure.
âThat means … no consultation of any kind, and no consideration of how these projects could impact our public lands, including federal lands,â Huffman said, noting that while geothermal energy enjoys bipartisan support as âa great source of clean power, a reliable base-load power source,â the proposed law encodes a âmassive loophole that the industry doesnât even need.â
Huffman said that permits need to be faster and more efficient, but there are âno opportunities for public comment or tribal consultationâ or Department of Interior comment.
The House has passed a package of geothermal bills, Huffman said, and the Senate âis considering a bipartisan package to promote responsible and streamlined geothermal development.â
âThis bill has not been part of those discussions, and itâs glaringly out-of-step with those efforts,â he said.
Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-Ark.) said the HEATS Act, introduced by Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.), would expedite geothermal energy development âon non-federal lands where federal minerals are involved.â
Right now, he said, geothermal operators on non-federal lands must comply with federal regulations and obtain federal permits, even if the share of federal minerals involved is minor.
âThis bill takes a common-sense approach to fix this problem by deferring to state regulatory frameworks when the share of federal mineral resources is less than 50 percent,â Westerman said, noting the measure does not change royalties paid to the federal government.
A Copper Debate
The Critical Mineral Consistency Act would amend the Energy Act of 2020 by including minerals defined as âcriticalâ by the DOE to be classified as âcriticalâ also by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
The mineral that compelled Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-Ariz.) to file the measure is copper, Westerman said, adding that the bill âwould create a symbiotic relationship betweenâ the lists.
USGSâs critical list focuses on non-fuel minerals essential for economic and national security vulnerable to supply-chain disruptions, Westerman said. DOE, he said, uses âa forward-looking methodology that accounts for international demand scenarios and growth trajectories, specifically for energy technologies.â
The bill, he added, is âan elegant solution to the common issue of critical mineral or critical material confusion that recognizes each agencyâs autonomy and expertise.â
Huffman called the proposal âa stunningly reckless billâ that is, âquite frankly, a naked giveaway to the copper mining industry.â
The lists reflect different types of expertise âmaintained by different agencies for distinctly different purposes, and thatâs why we should let agency experts, not politicians, decide what goes on each list,â he said.
Huffman said copper is not a critical material because thereâs no supply risk, there are low imports, and there are many available foreign sources, including Chile, Canada, and Mexico.
Copper is recyclable, with a third of the nationâs copper consumption coming through recycling, he said.
Warning About China
âAnd now we get to probably the most outrageous part of the bill. Itâs not just a giveaway to the copper industry, itâs a gift to the Chinese Communist Party,â Huffman said.
âAnd guess who owns the largest stake in Rio Tinto?â Huffman said. âThe Chinese government.â
The proposed bill gives too much away without asking much of extractive industries, he said.
âResolution Copper has not committed to keeping the copper from this project in the United States, so I guess itâs the honor system. We’ll just trust a company owned by our biggest foreign adversary to do the right thing with our copper,â Huffman said.
Original News Source Link – Epoch Times
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!