The firm argued that the presidentâs executive order violated its rights of free speech, free association, and due process.
A federal judge on March 12 agreed to temporarily block President Donald Trumpâs executive order stripping security clearances from employees at a prominent Washington law firm that was involved in generating the controversial Steele dossier.
Perkins Coie sued the Trump administration on Tuesday, arguing that the presidentâs order violated the firmâs rights of free speech, free association, and due process under the Constitution.
During a Wednesday hearing in Washington, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said she would grant the firmâs request for a temporary restraining order against the presidentâs order, which also sought to limit Perkins Coieâs work with federal contractors.
Trump ordered a government review aimed at ending all contracts the firm currently holds with any federal agencies and a review seeking to cancel contracts with its clients. The order also limits its lawyersâ ability to access government officials or retain security clearances.
In its lawsuit, Perkins Coie wrote that seven of its clients, including a major government contractor, had already pulled back legal work following Trumpâs order or were planning to, resulting in âsignificant revenueâ losses for the firm.
Government officials have also blocked or discouraged the firmâs attorneys from participating in meetings due to Trumpâs order, according to the lawsuit.
In 2016, after receiving funding from the DNC and Clinton campaign, Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steele, a retired British counterintelligence specialist, to gather research into allegations that Trumpâs 2016 campaign had conspired with the Russian government to win the presidential election.
Steeleâs research was compiled into a dossier that BuzzFeed News published without his consent in 2017. The outlet was criticized for not first independently verifying many of the reportâs salacious allegations, which sparked scrutiny among many journalists.
While some of the dossierâs more general findingsâincluding that Russia was working to get Trump elected and sought to influence some of his associatesâwere later corroborated by U.S. intelligence agencies and special counsel Robert Muellerâs investigation, the report has been largely debunked, and no one in the presidentâs orbit was ever formally accused of conspiring with Russia.
Trump previously sued Clinton, Perkins Coie, and others, alleging they conspired to rig the 2016 election against him. A federal judge in Florida dismissed the lawsuit in 2022.
Reuters contributed to this report.
Original News Source Link – Epoch Times
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!