The Senate Energy Committee holds a hearing at 9:30 a.m. EST on Feb. 8 to “examine the administration’s pause on LNG export approvals and the Department of Energy’s process for assessing LNG export applications.” Witnesses: David M. Turk, Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy Charlie Riedl, Executive Director, Center for… Original News Source Link –
Supreme Court reviews landmark case on Trump’s eligibility for re-election – CBS News Watch CBS News The Supreme Court is set to determine the legality of former President Donald Trump’s bid for re-election following his appeal against the decision to exclude him from Colorado’s primary ballot. View CBS News In Be the first to know
Bishop Michael Burbidge of Arlington and Bishop Barry Knestout of Richmond are speaking out against Virginia Senate Bill 280, which would legalize assisted suicide.
Republican Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz says he has "never missed George Santos more" following the failed GOP attempt to remove Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas.
Justice Alito Asks About Possible Fallout of a Colorado Ban Justice Samuel Alito asked Ms. Stevenson about the possibility that if Colorado banned Trump, then other states would “retaliate” and bar other candidates. Ms. Stevenson replied, “I think we have to have faith in our system that people will follow their election policies and processes
Defense Delivers Opening Statement Attorney Jonathan F. Mitchell, representing former President Donald Trump, told the justices that Section 3 did not apply to presidents, because the “officer of the United States” mentioned in the Constitution applies to appointed, not elected officials. He argued that even if one was disqualified, the candidate could not be barred
What to Know The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments on whether the Colorado Supreme Court erred in ruling that former President Donald Trump is disqualified as a candidate for the presidential primaries under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. Legal questions abound, and experts and stakeholders have urged the high court to address the