The Democrat-sponsored bill sought to establish a right to IVF, but Republicans opposed the measure saying it was an attempt at election-year messaging.
WASHINGTONâA bill to establish a right to use in vitro fertilization (IVF) and other fertility treatments fell short of the 60 votes required for it to advance in the Senate on June 13.
Republicans largely rejected the measureâdubbed the Right to IVF Actâresulting in a failed 48â47 vote. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) changed his vote to ânoâ at the last minute to reserve the ability to bring the bill up again.
In addition to cementing a statutory right to fertility treatments, the bill would have required private and federal health insurance plans to cover IVF treatments while also expanding access to the treatments for military members and veterans.
The measure was not expected to pass.
âThis is not a âshow vote.â Itâs a âshow us who you areâ vote,â Mr. Schumer said on the Senate floor ahead of the vote. âToday, unfortunately, it seems our Republican colleagues are going to show us just who they areâpeople who will not protect a womanâs right to IVF.â
His comments were made after all Senate Republicans affirmed their support for IVF and accused Democrats of âfearmongering.â
âIn vitro fertilization is legal and available in every state across our nation. We strongly support continued nationwide access to IVF, which has allowed millions of aspiring parents to start and grow their families,â the 49 Republican senators wrote in a June 12 statement.
The move to enshrine access to IVF follows a February ruling from the Alabama Supreme Court that human embryos created through the process are legally children under state law. Some IVF providers in the state responded by suspending their services until lawmakers passed a law shielding them from liability.
Sens. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) and Ted Cruz (R-Texas) put forward their own legislation to protect access to IVF nationwide. That bill would have withheld Medicaid funding from states that ban the procedure. However, when Mr. Cruz called for unanimous consent to pass the measure on June 12, Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) blocked the move.
Mr. Cruz said the Democratsâ legislation, of which Ms. Murray was a sponsor, did not include protections for the First Amendment rights of those who object to IVF on religious grounds.
âIf your faith teaches you not to use IVF, as a doctor, you should have the right to say: âI am not going to participate in that,â Mr. Cruz said.â
Hours before the Senate vote, House Democrats held a press conference in support of their companion bill, which sponsor Rep. Susan Wild (D-Pa.) said had garnered the support of four Republicans.
âRight now we have four Republicans who have signed on, and yet many, many claim to support IVF,â Ms. Wild said. âSo, words of support are nice to hear, but Americans need action, not empty promises. And so Iâm asking my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to put their money where their mouth is.â
Asked if Democrats would try to force a vote on the bill via a discharge petition, the congresswoman said she was discussing the matter with Republican members. She noted that even with the four who already support the bill, she would still need one more Republican to sign on to reach the 218-member threshold for that move to work.
âWeâre working on it,â she said.
Original News Source Link – Epoch Times
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!