The measure, which gives Congress until March to pass annual spending bills, was passed one day before a government funding deadline.
Congress has passed a stopgap funding bill one day before a government funding deadline, sending the measure to President Joe Biden’s desk for signature.
House Democrats joined Republicans to pass the measure on the evening of Jan. 18 in a 314-108 vote. Earlier in the day, the Senate passed the bill in a 77-18 vote.
The bill extends the deadline for Congress to pass its annual appropriations bills to March 1 and March 8. The move marks Congress’ third stopgap spending bill in four months.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and the White House reached an agreement on the interim measure on Jan. 14 and released their plan to be voted on in an effort to extend government funding which would partially run out on Jan. 19.
Mr. Schumer made a statement following the Jan. 14 agreement saying that, “To avoid a shutdown, it will take bipartisan cooperation in the Senate and the House to quickly pass the CR and send it to the President’s desk before Friday’s funding deadline.”
Mr. Johnson also commented on the CR the same day, saying that it “is required to complete what House Republicans are working hard to achieve: an end to governance by omnibus, meaningful policy wins, and better stewardship of American tax dollars.”
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (R-N.Y.) said just hours before the vote, “We recognize that a partial government shutdown will hurt everyday Americans…it’s my full expectation that House Democrats will continue to do the responsible thing.”
Legislation
A $1.59 trillion spending cap for the fiscal year was agreed upon by the House and Senate leaders, mirroring the agreement reached last year during debt limit negotiations between then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and President Joe Biden.
An extra $10 billion in IRS staff layoffs is part of the most recent agreement, which modifies the previous arrangement. It also includes COVID-19 funding of $6.1 billion and an increase in defense spending to $886 billion.
Legislators negotiated a 5.2 percent pay raise for members of the military and $704 billion for other discretionary spending. A side agreement reached would provide roughly $70 billion in further non-defense appropriations.
Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.) offered vehement disapproval from the House floor, asserting that conservative members of the House didn’t have an appropriate chance to amend the legislation, saying that they were “honoring the McCarthy-Schumer side deals from the Fiscal Responsibility Act,” referencing to the debt limit deal reached between then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and the White House last year.
“And every bipartisan disagreement is solved simply by spending for the progress of the opposing party,” Mr. Crane said, before going on to point out what he asserted were “rich” comments by his Democratic colleagues concerned about the sovereignty of the Ukrainian border while declining to reinforce the southern border of the United States.
“Talk is cheap,” Mr. Crane went on. “The American people deserve better.”
Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) also weighed in, saying that voting for the CR would be “continued funding for the CBP One app that is being used to use U.S. parole abusively … We will fund the EV, natural gas, and methane rule destroying access to reliable energy … We will fund the World Health Organization undermining our own sovereignty and cozying up to the CCP.
“We will fund the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian refugees to the Near East, which supports Hamas, over our ally Israel … We will be voting to their enemies right now today on the floor of the house. We will vote the pro-China, anti-Israel, United Nations Human Rights Council, [and] we will fund a weaponized Department of Justice and FBI.”
Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) said the CR would allow lawmakers “to draw out the calendar” so Republicans can achieve policy gains in the appropriations process.
“I’m here for policy wins,” Mr. McHenry told reports ahead of the vote. “I’m here for gains for the taxpayers and for economic growth. And for us to stick around here and make ourselves extend the pain is what creates suffering. And suffering is an active choice on the part of the majority.”
House Freedom Caucus members had pleaded with Mr. Johnson at the last minute to include a vote on immigration and border policy measures in the current CR proposal
“The Speaker is considering it, and he’s working through the mechanics to make sure that … we have the best path forward on how to do it within the legislative process,” Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.), chair of the Freedom Caucus, said while leaving Mr. Johnson’s office on Thursday prior to the Senate vote.
Such a move would throw a wrench into the plan to avert a partial shutdown. But a spokesperson for Johnson appeared to beat down the idea.
Conservatives within the House Republican Conference have spoken out against the agreement, pointing out that when discretionary expenditure is taken into account, the actual top-line amount is closer to $1.66 trillion.
Pressure on Johnson
Mr. Johnson’s agreement with the resolution has caused some Republicans to respond negatively to Mr. Johnson, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) who threatened to remove the House Speaker from office if he consented to a funding bill that she does not agree with.
Speaking to Real America’s Voice, Ms. Greene said she would support firing Mr. Johnson as leader if he doesn’t deliver for members of the party like herself who are getting tired of what they see as his failures.
The Georgia Republican voiced her frustration that elements put in place by the 117th Congressional Speaker, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) were still in place and that Democrats were in the process of negotiating down border security and pushing for an increase in funding for Ukraine.
Following the threat from Ms. Greene to vacate his position if he approves the CR, Mr. Johnson stated that he is “not concerned” about being removed from office during a Jan. 17 interview.
During an interview with CNN, the lawmaker was questioned about whether he was concerned about meeting the same fate as his predecessor, the former speaker, Mr. McCarthy. Mr. Johnson said that he is not concerned about the growing threats and he is focused on doing his job.
Joseph Lord and Samantha Flom contributed to this report.
Original News Source Link – Epoch Times
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!