House Fails to Pass Legislative Branch Spending Bill After 10 Republicans Voted Against It 👉 Updatem News

Ten Republicans broke with their House leadership to defeat a $7 billion bill to fund the legislative branch.

WASHINGTON—The House of Representatives on June 11 failed to pass a $7 billion spending bill to fund part of the government for fiscal year 2025 after a number of Republican members voted against it, representing a setback to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and the Republican leadership.

The Republican-backed Legislative Branch Appropriations Act of 2025 failed by a vote of 205 yeas to 213 nays.

Among the 10 Republican “nay” votes were Reps. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), Bob Good (R-Va.), and Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.), who are among a group of members that have dissented from the House Republican leadership in the past, including voting to remove House Speaker Kevin McCarthy from office in 2023.

Other Republicans who voted against the bill were Reps. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.), Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.), Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), and Keith Self (R-Texas).

“More spending. It was a 5.6 percent increase. I voted no on that because we killed all the cost-saving amendments. Everybody’s trying to protect their little fiefdoms, it seems,” Mr. Burchett said in a video posted on social media after the vote.

“The country is approaching $35 trillion in debt! I voted against the legislative appropriations bill because we shouldn’t proceed by increasing spending within our own house. We should be cutting spending for every entity in government and should be leading by example,” wrote Mr. Gaetz on social media, explaining his vote.

Mr. Johnson (R-La.) did not directly respond to The Epoch Times’ questions about why the bill failed.

“We’ll talk about that later. We’re not deterred in any way. We’re getting the job done here,” he told The Epoch Times in the Speaker’s Lobby as he exited the House after the vote.

To the disappointment of some members, the bill did not include a cost-of-living-adjustment to their salaries, which have been static at $174,000 for the last 15 years. “This is a serious issue as to whether or not the only people that could serve here are rich people,” Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) remarked at a committee hearing about the bill on June 13.

After the vote, Republican members expressed doubts that the body would collaborate to get its appropriations legislation completed on time.

“I think the appropriations bills are going to have a difficult time getting through,” Rep. Carlos Giménez (R-Fla.) told The Epoch Times after the vote. “We’re probably looking at some kind of continuing resolution sometime in September, when the question is, how long is that continuing resolution going to be for.”

The House is currently considering 12 annual appropriations bills that will fund the government after Sept. 30 for the fiscal year. Four bills—funding the Departments of Defense, State, Homeland Security, and Veterans’ Affairs—have already passed the House.

Mr. Johnson told The Epoch Times that he still plans to pass all 12 bills before the August recess. “We scheduled that and we’re still working toward that goal,” he said. Mr. Johnson, before becoming speaker, had vowed to cancel the planned August recess if all spending bills weren’t passed.

The bill’s defeat was a contrast from the buoyant mood at a press conference that morning held by House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole (R-Okla.), where he touted his committee’s completion of all bill markups. “We’ve done our job,” he said.

Republicans who voted against the bill have been contacted with requests for comment.

Original News Source Link – Epoch Times

Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!