The president-elect’s vision is drawing attention amid widespread concern over housing and middle-class prosperity.
On the campaign trail, President-elect Donald J. Trump outlined many big plans, from achieving energy dominance to carrying out the largest deportation operation in American history. Now, as his administration begins to take shape, enthusiasm is building for Trump’s proposed solution to the housing crisis: chartering new “Freedom Cities” using millions of acres of what is currently federal land.
A year and a half later, in the lobby of a D.C. hotel, Nick Allen was enthusiastic about that vision.
“When there are new cities that are built in the U.S., new industries can form, and a new middle class can emerge,” he told The Epoch Times.
Meanwhile, some early skeptics of Trump’s Freedom Cities vision are changing their tune.
These days, though, Mason sounds more hopeful.
“The outsized role that the tech community is probably going to play in this administration has generally made me more optimistic about the potential for doing some version of Freedom Cities,” he told The Epoch Times.
“The federal government really does own a lot of land well-suited to housing—and is uniquely positioned to build it, given its insulation from local zoning and complaining local NIMBYs [“not-in-my-backyard”],” Gray wrote before detailing where he thinks Freedom Cities could be sited.
City Journal, the same publication in which Mason’s 2023 critique appeared, just released a pro-Freedom Cities article from Allen and his Frontier Foundation colleague, Mark Lutter.
‘City Air Makes You Free’
There’s a long history of cities asserting sovereignty, from the city-states of ancient Greece to the Hanseatic League of medieval northern Europe.
“All these different kinds of entities that existed exerted significant economic influence despite being relatively limited in their geographic scope,” Mason said.
But the link between urban life and freedom runs deeper, from the social organism down to the individual.
For German peasants of the Late Middle Ages, the saying “Stadtluft macht frei”—“City air makes you free”—referred to a legal way out of feudal bondage. To this day, the problems afflicting many large cities, from violent crime to unaffordable housing, exist alongside social and cultural dynamism and paths to success.
More recent models include Hong Kong, which grew rapidly during the second half of the 20th century. The dependent territory of the United Kingdom was known for its free-market orientation, earning praise from economist Milton Friedman.
Patrick Hiebert of EcoVillages said his ongoing work developing small, sustainable, liberty-minded cities in Latin America became more popular amid government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
There are many other real-world examples of innovation in independent governance—some much larger in scale than tropical libertarian villages.
The Walt Disney World Resort grew up in Florida’s Reedy Creek Improvement District, now the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District.
Allen points to the modern history of the Brooklyn Navy Yard. During the 1960s, New York City purchased the former naval shipbuilding facility from the federal government, converting it into an industrial park that fell under the authority of a nonprofit.
“This is a normal path to prosperity in a Western nation-state,” Allen said.
Brooklyn Navy Yard also provides precedent for another site that may be under consideration as a Freedom City, the former Lowry Air Force Base in Colorado.
The Trump-Vance transition team did not respond to requests for comment on the decommissioned military installation or any other Freedom City prospects.
Of course, the quest for sovereignty isn’t easy or guaranteed.
One ambitious and high-profile charter city vision, the California Forever project, has hit a snag.
A ballot measure in support of its East Solano Plan, which would develop 60,000 acres of farmland in Solano County for up to 400,000 residents, was withdrawn from the ballot ahead of November’s election.
Legislative Initiatives
Some recent legislative proposals could offer models for Freedom Cities.
James Quintero of the Texas Public Policy Foundation likened the Freedom Cities concept to Liberty Cities in an email to The Epoch Times.
“For Freedom Cities to truly succeed, proponents must limit federal interference that might result from coercive funding, regulatory favoritism, and corporate welfare. Government meddling is the great danger here,” he wrote.
Another likely model is the federal-level HOUSES Act, introduced by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) in 2022 and again in 2023.
Any effort to transfer Interior Department lands will likely take place under the watch of Trump’s proposed interior secretary, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum.
Challenges on the Horizon
Even as it pushed to explore development on public land, Montana’s report emphasized that it was not recommending legislation to authorize development on state trust land. A dissenting opinion stresses that the Department of Fish and Wildlife land and other “coveted public lands” would not be targeted.
Indeed, the talk of Freedom Cities has sparked pushback over the possible sale of public lands to private parties, particularly if environmental interests are threatened.
Gray, of California YIMBY, expects more objections to materialize.
Lee’s bill, the possible model for Freedom Cities, exempts federally protected land like National Monuments, National Parks, and National Wildlife Refuges.
Political feasibility is another sticking point. As Mason wrote in 2023, it’s hard to build new cities in the United States.
“In some other countries, the Ministry of Industry or whatever comes in and says, ‘Okay, here’s a zone. It’s got these towers,’ and it’s a much simpler process. That’s just not how things are going to work here,” Allen told The Epoch Times.
There may be other philosophical conflicts even among proponents of Freedom Cities.
Texas’s Liberty Cities and other visions stress economic liberty. In an era of automation, and under the logic of the market, that might not always translate to the broad, middle-class employment that defined mid-20th century industrial hubs like Detroit.
Allen thinks new cities must go hand in hand with new jobs.
“I don’t think the new cities should be unmanned data centers for nuclear plants,” he added.
For all the possible challenges and complications, the scope of the housing crisis is starting to drive consensus and collaboration across partisan and ideological lines.
And huge, ambitious projects have a way of drawing attention and advocates, at least at first.
“I think people do like to see big projects and new things getting built,” Mason said.
Original News Source Link – Epoch Times
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!