Republicans Face Fallout From ‘Crossover’ Haley Voters

While GOP candidate Nikki Haley was campaigning against former President Donald Trump, she declared: “Chaos follows him.” But now, in an ironic twist, fallout from Ms. Haley’s campaign threatens to cause chaos for other Republicans’ campaigns for years to come.

The problem: organizations that supported Ms. Haley recruited non-Republicans to change their voter registrations to the GOP, then encouraged them to vote for her in states that permit “crossover” voting in primaries or caucuses. Thus, in those states, many left-leaning voters now are masquerading as Republicans in voter data files—information that campaigners and pollsters mine to do their work.

He urged Republican voters to vote Democrat and “keep the primaries going” in 2008, after then Sen. John McCain had locked up the Republican nomination for president. McCain subsequently lost the presidential election to Democrat Barack Obama.

Now Republicans are seeing the tables turned, with costly consequences.

Related Stories

That financial toll will come from futile marketing efforts and data-cleanup operations; the tainted data could also cause losses in races that Republicans otherwise were positioned to win.

Enhanced Use of Old Tactic

“It’s really been happening for years,” Mr. Bowyer said. “But [what] we’ve realized, over time, is that it’s so detrimental to the Republican Party.”

Even so, this year’s election cycle featured the best-funded, most organized crossover-voting effort either of the interviewees had ever seen.

At election polls in various states, firsthand witnesses for Turning Point Action saw these voters “were organized; they were told to show up,” Mr. Bowyer said.

His biggest concern: The data problems will “make it harder for us to win in November,” he said.

“It’s going to impact not only the presidential race but everything all the way down the ballot,” he said, even races for seats on local school boards and city councils.

Because of the now-misleading voter-registration designations in the voter rolls, Republicans “will actually go knock on the doors of Democrats who have no interest in voting for any type of Republicans in November,” Mr. Bowyer said. “And now they’re going to effectively waste their time and energy reaching out to those voters.”

Long-Lasting Impact

In many local contests, only a few dozen votes could make the difference between victory and defeat. “Having all these Nikki Haley Democrat voters that now are seemingly Republican” can cause candidates to lose those races, Mr. Bowyer said.

Mr. Baris estimated that it would take two to four election cycles to identify and purge anti-Republicans from the data. “We need at least two cycles before we can be comfortable that we can weed somebody out,” he said. “Otherwise, we are risking weeding-out a new Republican voter who was a Democrat … and we risk ignoring them, not engaging them.”

However, others discount the detrimental effects of the crossover votes.

Longtime Democrat strategist David Carlucci considers the open-primary system “a healthy thing for democracy.”

“It makes the campaign’s job harder,” he told The Epoch Times. “But I think it gives more options to the voter, which should be the case.”

And, Ms. Haley previously told The Epoch Times that she believes her candidacy benefited the GOP by welcoming people who previously felt excluded from the Republican Party.

The former president repeatedly stated that large vote totals would reflect the strength of his candidacy, sending a loud message to his presumed Democrat opponent for the Nov. 5 general election, President Joe Biden.

In retaliation, a segment of President Biden’s supporters decided to vote for Ms. Haley. They apparently decided that racking up her vote totals and detracting from President Trump’s margin of victory was more important than casting a vote of confidence for President Biden, who faced no major threat from Democrat contenders.

“There are Democratic voters who hate Trump more than they love Joe Biden,” Mr. Baris said, explaining the phenomenon.

Still, he said, the crossover voters most likely were repeatedly goaded into taking that step. It typically requires six or seven “points of contact” to persuade people to take action, he said, adding, “That’s the industry standard … you can’t just send a mailer to a voter and get them to crossover.”

Following the Money

Making all of those contacts costs money and requires organization.

In an unusual move, Democrats heavily funded Ms. Haley’s campaign—something Mr. Baris cannot envision Republican donors doing for a Democrat candidate.

Likewise, he doubts Democrat-leaning groups would lead organized efforts to persuade Democrats to vote for a Republican, as they did for Ms. Haley. He obtained flyers that were targeted to Democrats, urging them to vote in Republican contests in several states.

Mr. Carlucci suggested that political consultants should be able to overcome data issues that the Haley crossovers caused; that’s their job, he said.

But Mr. Baris said excising the disingenuous flip-flopping voters is an arduous, costly task—one that Republicans have trouble getting donors to support.

Democrat donors seem willing to fork over cash to pay for behind-the-scenes grunt work, he said.

But Republicans “cut checks for dumb things like, ‘Oh, I want to have a say in the ad you’re gonna run,’ or ‘I want to be able to pick up the phone and call the candidate whenever I want,’” Mr. Baris said.

That’s how Republican donors have been conditioned to think over the years. Democrat donors were programmed differently.

“They understand what really wins elections;  you can get a Democrat millionaire or billionaire on the phone, and they’ll pop their checkbook out automatically,” Mr. Baris said. “That is not the case with Republicans.”

Remedial Action Needed

Another key difference: “We don’t have a well-oiled machine that’s preventing people from messing around with our data,” Mr. Bowyer said; Democrats do.

Democrats have responded more decisively against Democrat-labeled candidates whose activities might undermine the party as a whole, he said.

“They‘ll kick you out; they’ll say, ‘You’re no longer welcome,’” Mr. Bowyer said.

He thinks that’s partly why presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK) disconnected from the Democrat party to run as an independent.

“RFK was forced to represent independents because the Democrats cut him off,” Mr. Bowyer said.

He thinks stronger measures are needed to rein in candidates like Ms. Haley, who lack a viable path to victory and/or are courting voters from the other party. Failure to clamp down on such candidates is “like knifing your own self in the back,” he said.

He concedes that competitors have the right to throw their hats into the ring. Yet he says those candidates should be discouraged from persisting with a doomed campaign, which will “mess up all the data that’s going to affect everyone else.”

An attitude shift is needed to get Republican leaders and donors to prioritize “the very necessary work that Republicans are very behind on right now,” including data management, Mr. Baris said.

“That work is not sexy,“ he said. ”But it wins elections.”

Nathan Worcester contributed.