‘Elections should be decided by the voters at the ballot box and not by judges and prosecutors,’ the Texas Republican said.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has expressed hope that the U.S. Supreme Court will put an end to the “enormous abuse of power” aimed at former President Donald Trump after it agreed to review whether he is immune from prosecution in the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) federal criminal case, which relates to his efforts to challenge the 2020 election results.
Mr. Cruz made the comments in an interview on NewsNation’s “Elizabeth Vargas Reports” on Feb. 28. “I have to say, I’m glad the Supreme Court is taking the case. I have to say what we’ve seen in the past year—about the targeting from the left, the targeting from Democrat prosecutors of Donald Trump—has been an enormous abuse of power,” the lawmaker said.
“We’ve never in our history had a president or former president indicted, and in the past year, Donald Trump has been indicted four different times by both the Biden Justice Department and by two Democrat D.A.s [district attorneys], and I think this is an abuse of power and persecution of President Trump. And I very much hope that the Supreme Court puts a stop to it,” he continued.
Asked how he believes the nation’s highest court will rule on the matter, Mr. Cruz said, “We’ll see how the arguments play out … the arguments on both sides.” He added that he hopes the court steps in and “decides the elections should be decided by the voters at the ballot box and not by judges and prosecutors.”
Trump Welcomes Supreme Court Review
While prosecutors have argued presidents enjoy no immunity from criminal prosecution, President Trump’s lawyers claim he has complete immunity under federal law, pointing to a 1982 Supreme Court case, Nixon v. Fitzgerald.
That case granted presidential immunity from civil lawsuits for acts within the “outer perimeter” of the president’s official responsibilities. President Trump’s lawyers argue that his actions in questioning the election results were part of his official duties and therefore he should be immune from criminal prosecution.
“Legal scholars are extremely thankful for the Supreme Court’s decision today to take up presidential immunity. Without presidential immunity, a president will not be able to properly function or make decisions in the best interest of the United States of America,” the former president wrote.
“Presidents will always be concerned, and even paralyzed, by the prospect of wrongful prosecution and retaliation after they leave office,” he continued. “This could actually lead to the extortion and blackmail of a President. The other side would say, ‘If you don’t do something, just the way we want it, we are going to go after you when you leave office, or perhaps even sooner.’”
Caden Pearson contributed to this report.
Original News Source Link – Epoch Times
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!