Few Americans under age 65 will clearly recall the name Hubert Humphrey, who died in 1978 at age 66 after a landmark career as a U.S. senator, four tortured years as Lyndon B. Johnsonâs vice president, and a 1968 presidential loss to Richard Nixon. Both Samuel Freedman and James Traub are long-distinguished journalists and authors who also qualify as senior citizens; three decades ago this writer reviewed both Freedmanâs Small Victories: The Real World of a Teacher, Her Students & Their High School (1990) and Traubâs City on a Hill: Testing the American Dream at City College (1994).
These authorsâ two recent books address the same person in decidedly different ways. Freedmanâs Into the Bright Sunshine focuses on Humphreyâs life from childhood in small town South Dakota through his election as mayor of Minneapolis to his 1948 national emergence as an unlikely champion of black civil rights at that yearâs Democratic National Convention. Traub covers that ground too in True Believer, but his is a full, traditional biography whose most gripping chapters detail Humphreyâs agonizing service under Johnson and how the presidentâs unbending embrace of the war in Vietnam ensured Humphreyâs 1968 loss to Nixon.
Humphreyâs economically pressed family lost their home when Hubert was 11, and only in 1938 as a married, 27-year-old University of Minnesota undergraduate did Humphrey find his adult footing thanks to a course titled American Constitutional Development, taught by a young political scientist Humphreyâs own age, Evron Kirkpatrickâlater best known as the spouse of Ronald Reaganâs influential U.N. ambassador, Jeane. Kirkpatrickâs course, writes Traub, was âthe catapult that launched Humphrey on his life path,â and the following year Humphrey moved his young family all the way to Baton Rouge, La., to begin a one-year masterâs degree in political science at Louisiana State University.
Life in Louisianaâs rigidly segregated capital taught Humphrey multiple lessons. Witnessing blatant Southern racism âalso opened my eyes to the prejudice of the North,â he later wrote, and classes with Rudolf Heberle, a refugee who had fled Germany after Nazi bureaucrats discovered his Jewish ancestry, led Humphrey to conclude that âminority persecution is the first sign of social disintegration.â Yet the centerpiece of what Freedman rightly calls âhis pivotal year at LSUâ was the writing of Humphreyâs masterâs thesis. âThe Political Philosophy of the New Dealâ was such a fanboy paean to President Franklin Roosevelt that the author âfound not a single fault with FDR and the New Deal, not even the presidentâs catastrophic attempt to pack the Supreme Court.â
Humphrey wanted to pursue a Ph.D. and was accepted by Princeton, yet his familyâs strained finances forced him to return to Minneapolis and take up a series of Works Progress Administration posts, in which he excelled. A local politician suggested the novice 32 year old challenge the cityâs do-nothing mayor, and although Humphrey declared his candidacy only three weeks before the 1943 election, he lost by just 6,000 votes. Establishing himself as a vibrant local voice, two years later Humphrey defeated the incumbent by over 30,000.
Freedmanâs impressively original work includes detailed portrayals of how two significant figures in Minneapolisâs black and Jewish communitiesânewspaper publisher Cecil Newman and underemployed attorney Sam Scheinerâtaught Humphrey about the pervasiveness of the cityâs racist and anti-Semitic practices. In 1946, one year into Humphreyâs mayoralty, prominent journalist Carey McWilliams named Minneapolis âthe capital of anti-Semitism in the United States,â and early in 1947 a local neo-Nazi tried to assassinate Humphreyâan attempt the mayor amazingly refused to publicize!
That same year Humphrey became one of the founding figures in the newly revamped Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), a liberal effort to counteract the communist sympathizers (and worse) clustered around former vice president Henry Wallace, who would mount a left-wing challenge to Rooseveltâs White House successor, Harry S. Truman. Testifying before Congress in June 1947, Humphrey proclaimed that âwe profess a belief in justice and equality of opportunity, but we practice injustice and discrimination against the members of minority racial, religious, and nationality groups in every one of these United States. ⊠This is a problem of national morality.â
Four months later, a Truman-appointed commission published a powerful indictment of American racism entitled, âTo Secure These Rights.â But with public opinion polling showing that 82 percent of respondents opposed the commissionâs recommendations, and only 9 percent in support, Truman distanced himself from its handiwork, leaving it to the young ADA to champion its provisions. Matters came to a head at the July 1948 DNC, where some 1,200 delegatesâonly 10 of them blackâwould renominate Truman for the presidency. Thirty-seven-year-old mayor Humphrey was the ADAâs spokesman for a platform plank that would embrace the commissionâs conclusions in the face of Southern segregationistâand presidentialâopposition. The Democratic party, Humphrey proclaimed, needed âto get out of the shadows of statesâ rights and to walk forthrightly into the bright sunshine of human rights.â The ADA prevailed by a vote of 651 to 582.
Traub calls Humphreyâs oration âa ten-minute address that changed the world,â for, as Freedman explains, âwhat he said on that day set into motion the partisan realignment that defines American politics right up through the present.â Humphrey himself knew as much at that time, and a few months later he wrote in the New York Times that the convention had highlighted âthe inevitable split over civil rights that exists in the Democratic party.â
By then, the president had been reelected, with black voters supplying the margins by which Truman carried the electorally decisive states of California, Illinois, and Ohio. That same evening, Humphrey defeated Republican Joseph Ball to become the first Democrat ever elected to the U.S. Senate from Minnesota.
Humphrey was unprepared for life in a new setting and new city where neither he nor his wife Murielâwho âwas raising four children almost entirely on her own,â Traub notesâknew hardly anyone. Humphrey âplunged into Senate life without making an effort to understand the institutionâs cultureâ and found himself rejected by most of his new colleagues. âNever in my life have I felt so unwanted as I did during those first few months in Washington,â Humphrey later wrote. âI was unhappy in the Senate, uncomfortable, awkward, unable to find a place.â
Salvation came in the form of one of his fellow Democratic freshmen, Texas moderate Lyndon Johnson, who went about making Humphrey his pet liberal. âJohnson did more to bring me into those more social relationships with the conservative members of the Democratic Party than any other person,â Humphrey explained in a late-life interview. By the time of his 1954 reelection, Humphrey was a âless adversarialâ senator, Traub writes, thanks to âa change of temperamentâ that would make him âa creature of the institution in which he worked.â
Johnson led the Senate to pass a very modest Civil Rights Act in 1957, with Humphrey full well understanding how segregationist Democratsâ dominance of the chamber severely delimited the hopes of liberals like himself. Yet Humphrey ranged far afield as a senator, including a remarkable eight-and-a-half-hour conversation in the Kremlin with Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in November 1958, âthe most thrilling and the most important event in Humphreyâs lifeâ since the DNC a decade earlier, Traub notes.
Humphreyâs increasing prominence drew him into the 1960 presidential primaries, where he was trounced by his Massachusetts colleague John F. Kennedy, who âwas a better candidate and ran a better campaign,â Traub observes. But Humphreyâs reward, as Johnson left the Senate to become vice president, was the chamberâs number two post, Democratic whip, an especially influential role given how in Montanaâs dyspeptic Mike Mansfield, Johnsonâs successor as majority leader, âHumphrey had a boss who didnât believe in his own job,â Traub memorably writes. But only in the wake of Kennedyâs November 1963 assassination and Johnsonâs ascension to the presidency would Humphrey tackle what would become âthe supreme achievement of his legislative career.â
Kennedy finally had proposed a muscular civil rights bill five months before his murder, but Johnson immediately embraced that measure as his signature desire, with Humphrey assigned to shepherd it past the Senateâs daunting two-thirds filibuster threshold. Several superb books, including Clay Risenâs The Bill of the Century (2014), narrate that legislative struggle, but on June 9 cloture was invoked with a remarkable 71 votes in the affirmative. Four weeks later the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed into law. Capitol Hillâs leading weekly heralded Humphreyâs âmasterful, day-in and day-out perseverance,â and Traub reports the whip lost 20 pounds during the three months the bill spent on the Senate floor.
Come the Democratsâ August convention, Johnson unsurprisingly named Humphrey as his vice-presidential running mate. A landslide November victory followed, but Humphreyâs ensuing four years were an endless travail of âhumiliation and pathosâ at the hands of a deeply insecure and often sadistic president. Humphrey was âthoroughly shut out of national security issues,â and Johnson âroutinely belittled and ridiculed Humphreyâ to multiple aides and officials, Traub reports. While âHumphrey was powerless to affect policy in Vietnamâ as Johnson repeatedly intensified American military intervention from 1965 into 1967, Humphrey nonetheless ânever flinched from his job of justifying the warâ to audiences at home.
On March 31, 1968, Johnson astonished first Humphrey and then, a few hours later, the entire nation by announcing that he would not run for reelection that fall. Humphreyâs Minnesota colleague Eugene McCarthy and fellow New York senator Robert F. Kennedy had already mounted presidential challenges, and now Johnson was handing Humphrey what Traub rightly calls âa poisoned chaliceâ as the Democratic candidate tasked with defending the war.
Humphrey formally announced his candidacy on April 27, touting what he called âthe politics of joy,â but the phrase sounded coldly archaic in a country that had just witnessed the murder of Martin Luther King Jr. and widespread ensuing riots. Kennedy caustically responded, âIf you see a small black child starving to death in the Mississippi Delta, as I have, it is not the politics of joy,â and come June Robert Kennedyâs own assassination deepened the atmosphere of national disaster.
Humphrey won the Democratic nomination despite even his old ADA friends now viewing him âas a hapless Johnson puppet,â yet Johnson seemed ambivalent about whether he favored Humphrey or Republican nominee Richard Nixon. Humphrey was so âbeaten down after four years as Johnsonâs valet,â Traub writes, that âhe was not the man he had been not only in 1948 but in 1964.â Indeed, he quotes a Humphrey aide recalling how the vice president bitterly remarked, âIâve eaten so much of Johnsonâs shit in this job that Iâve gotten to like the taste of it.â
In November, Nixon bested Humphrey in multiple crucial statesâCalifornia, Illinois, Ohio, New Jersey, and Pennsylvaniaâas âthe working class white voters who had constituted the core of FDRâs coalitionâ abandoned Humphrey for either Nixon or third-party racial conservative George Wallace. Two years later, Humphrey returned to the Senate for a final term, and in 1976 he surprisingly encouraged his Minnesota colleague Walter Mondale to join presidential nominee Jimmy Carterâs ticket: âBeing vice president was the best thing that ever happened to me, regardless of how I was treated.â
Yet the stain of Vietnam was indelible, and shortly before his death Humphrey acknowledged that his greatest regret was indeed âthe misjudgment of Vietnam. At the time I did what I thought was right. It was not because Johnson was forcing me,â but âworking in the White House atmosphere, I became convinced that we were doing the right thing.â
Nonetheless, Hubert Humphrey indisputably changed first Minneapolis and then the United States for the better. Yet progress is not irreversible. In 2017, two years before Minneapolis would go back to its past by sending Ilhan Omar to Congress, Sam Scheinerâs daughter Susan Druskin quoted to Freedman her late fatherâs prescient warning about the enduring evil of anti-Semitism: âIt will all be back. It never goes away. It goes below the surface of society and is dormant. The minute somebody permits it, it reemerges.â Oy vey.
True Believer: Hubert Humphreyâs Quest for a More Just America
by James Traub
Basic Books, 518 pp., $35
Into the Bright Sunshine: Young Hubert Humphrey and the Fight for Civil Rights
by Samuel G. Freedman
Oxford University Press, 488 pp., $34.95
David J. Garrowâs books include the Pulitzer Prize-winning Martin Luther King Jr. biography Bearing the Cross and Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama.
Original News Source â Washington Free Beacon
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Management â Election Day Strategies!