The lower chamberās ābudget reconciliationā resolution is in a single bill, whereas the Senate offers a two-bill package and more defense and border spending.
President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he supports the House of Representativesās budget bill that would fund several of his policy initiatives, instead of a two-bill plan proffered by the Senate.
Ordinarily, to pass any legislation, at least 60 senators must vote to invoke āclotureā on a bill to limit debate and advance the bill to final passage. Without cloture, debate can continue indefinitely, and senators may āfilibusterā to prevent the bill from being passed.
The Senate Republican Conference has only 53 members in the 100-member Senate, meaning that bills require the support of at least seven Democrats to passāsomething that is unlikely to happen for conservative legislation.
Hence, for the past several months, ābudget reconciliationā has been the focus. This process enables budgetary legislationā that is, concerning taxation, spending, and public borrowingāto be passed without minority party support.
The rules of the Senate limit debate on reconciliation-related bills. Cloture can be invoked with a simple majority. This would permit Republicans to pass partisan bills with their slim majorities in both houses of Congress.
Budget reconciliation first requires concurrent passage of a ābudget resolutionā in both houses that instructs committees to recommend spending increases or cuts, which are then used to draft any final bills. In this initial step, Republicans have faced disagreements between the House and Senate on both strategy and substance.
House Republicans want to pass only one bill that addresses all their prioritiesāwith consensus in the House being fragile. The Senate seeks to pass two bills, with the first addressing border security and immigration enforcement. This would give Congress more time to consider a second bill addressing the debt limit and tax cut expansion.
A reconciliation bill cannot increase the deficit after 10 years, which means that any permanent provisions must be offset by large spending reductions.
On Feb. 19, Trump voiced his preference for the House of Representativesās plan for a single bill.
He referred to Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who has sponsored the Senateās approach.
āNothing would please me more than one, big, beautiful bill. … That is my preference,ā Graham said at a news conference on Feb. 11. āNow, what guides my thinking is the problem we have now: Weāre running out of money.
āTo my friends in the House, weāre moving because we have to. … Weāre not building a wall, folks, weāre hitting a wall. [The Trump Administration] need[s] the money, and they need it now.ā
The Houseās budget resolution seeks to allocate $4.5 trillion for taxation-related matters. This would mean extending some rate reductions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and allowing for a $4 trillion increase in the federal governmentās sovereign debt limit.
However, it would also allocate less money for defense spending and border security than the Senateās plan.
It remains unclear whether the Senate will change its approach. Grahamās office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Original News Source Link – Epoch Times
Running For Office? Conservative Campaign Consulting – Election Day Strategies!