By Rachel Koning Beals
Rule is likely to fire up opponents of environmental, social and governance principles — including Ron DeSantis — who have railed against ‘woke capitalism’
The Department of Labor finalized a rule Tuesday that explicitly permits retirement-plan fiduciaries to consider climate change and other environmental, social and governance (ESG) features when selecting investments or meeting shareholder demands.
The rule, first proposed in October 2021, essentially reverses two rules advanced under the Trump administration.
One of the Trump-era rules said retirement-plan fiduciaries — professionals required by law to manage a person’s money for the individual’s benefit and not for that of the company or retirement-planning firm — could not invest in “nonpecuniary” vehicles. Nonpecuniary, at least as intended in the old rule, suggested that ESG was an add-on consideration not material to the plan’s performance and, in fact, could sacrifice returns or add additional risk to a plan.
A second rule had outlined the process a fiduciary must undertake when making decisions on casting a shareholder proxy vote.
Economic interests first
Tuesday’s announcement means that retirement planners and advisers won’t face pushback for using ESG (ESGU) principles to help determine an investment mix for retirement plans, including 401(k)s.
But, DOL’s language maintains a long-standing position that plan fiduciaries must put the economic interests of participants and beneficiaries above other considerations, said the Investment Company Institute, the top trade association for the fund industry.
ICI said in a release it welcomes the department’s clarification that while fiduciaries may include consideration of climate change and other ESG effects as part of their risk-return analysis, they must put the financial interests of plan participants first and cannot sacrifice potential returns for these goals.
Opinion:Here’s an easier way to think about ESG investing
Proponents of ESG said the rules ideally help investors understand more of what goes into decision-making. These proponents argue, for instance, that a publicly traded company’s transparency on lowering greenhouse-gas emissions can mean that its management has taken a thorough look at energy waste and costs. Similarly, a corporate board’s push to include diverse members can reflect a healthy scrutiny of operations — good governance, period.
“Given the recent wave of misinformed political attacks seeking to undermine the validity of ESG investing strategies, this rulemaking comes at an important time and provides much-needed clarity for investors and fiduciaries that ESG factors are indeed material,” said Fran Seegull, president of the U.S. Impact Investing Alliance.
‘Woke capitalism’ fight continues
Some — mostly Republican — lawmakers have vowed action on industry trends that favor ESG screening, which they say puts “woke capitalism” ahead of profits and investment returns.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, considered one of the top contenders for his party’s presidential nomination in 2024, is among the high-profile Republicans who have made statements on this topic. DeSantis said in a July news release that the ESG movement “threatens the vitality of the American economy and Americans’ economic freedom by targeting disfavored individuals and industries to advance a woke ideological agenda.”
Opinion: Ron DeSantis ramps up attack on ‘woke capital’ with ESG crackdown
Also see: Jamie Dimon says stopping oil and gas funding would be ‘road to hell for America’
At least two Republican lawmakers expressed their concern Tuesday that some investors relying on employee 401(k)s and other plans would be exposed to ESG without knowing it.
“The Biden administration’s new rule jeopardizes the financial security of many retirement savers, especially workers and retirees who may be put into ESG investments by default,” said Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, Republican leader of the Education and Labor committee, and Rick Allen of Georgia, Republican leader and the Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions subcommittee.
Brian Gardner, chief Washington policy strategist at Stifel, has said it’s likely that Republicans will take action on this topic after the new Congress convenes. The GOP secured a narrow majority in the House in the midterm elections, while the Senate remains under Democrats’ control, also by a slim margin.
Another kind of screener
Lisa Woll, CEO of US SIF, an organization that promotes responsible and sustainable investing, said she often has to explain to the public and even to her professional connections that ESG isn’t a singular investing theme per se, but rather a layer of scrutiny that is added to the checklist already applied to stock picking.
And, she said on a recent Morningstar panel, the actions of some conservative state officials and conservative judges at the federal level who have pushed for “anti-woke” investment of state pension money means she’s having more of these discussions than ever.
Some observers note that the new Labor Department rule can help workers who are invested in employee retirement funds feel more empowered over where their money is going, and also that ESG can actually focus on pro-growth investing in a world that is shifting away from fossil fuels and gas-powered cars to favor alternatives like electric vehicles (TSLA) and solar power (ICLN).
The department “took an important step to safeguard the millions of workers who participate in private-sector employee benefit plans,” said Natalia Renta, senior policy counsel for corporate governance and power with the Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund.
“Now, workers will be better able to avoid investment risks, like those caused by the effects of union busting, worsening climate impacts and destructive corporate governance practices — see the latest Twitter developments, for example — and take advantage of investment opportunities like those presented by robust investments in workforces, the transition to a green economy, and corporate transparency and accountability,” Renta said in a statement.
ESG has faced some tough scrutiny in recent months, arguably of its own making, with accusations of “greenwashing,” or promising more feel-good results than some indexes, funds and exchange-traded funds can deliver.
Don’t miss:Tesla dumped by S&P ESG index and Musk cries label is a ‘scam’
-Rachel Koning Beals
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
11-22-22 1658ET
Copyright (c) 2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Original News Source Link