In a dramatic legal twist, Special Counsel David Weiss and Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors have rejected the notion that President Joe Biden’s act of clemency for his son, Hunter Biden, erases the criminal charges against him. This unprecedented clash has sent shockwaves through the legal and political arenas, igniting a fierce debate over the boundaries of presidential pardon power.
Hunter Biden, who previously pled guilty to charges related to tax evasion and unlawful possession of a firearm, sought dismissal of his indictment following his father’s clemency gesture. Yet, in a blistering court filing on Sunday, December 1, Special Counsel Weiss unequivocally opposed the move, asserting that a pardon does not nullify the grand jury’s indictment or the underlying finding of probable cause.
“The defendant pled guilty to all the charges in the indictment on September 5, 2024,” the filing reads. “According to the declaration filed on his behalf, the defendant again acknowledged his guilt in accepting the act of clemency.”
The prosecutors went further, criticizing Hunter Biden for failing to formally docket the pardon in court proceedings. “If media reports are accurate, the Government does not challenge that the defendant has been the recipient of an act of mercy. But that does not mean the grand jury’s decision to charge him, based on a finding of probable cause, should be wiped away as if it never occurred,” Weiss’s filing stated.
This firm rebuke underscores the contention that clemency, while an act of mercy, does not inherently absolve legal guilt or undo the processes that led to indictment. Prosecutors argued that Hunter Biden’s claims of improper prosecutorial motives lack merit, highlighting that no court has supported his assertions.
“It also does not mean that his charges should be wiped away because the defendant falsely claimed that the charges were the result of some improper motive. No court has agreed with the defendant on these baseless claims, and his request to dismiss the indictment finds no support in the law or the practice of this district,” the filing declared.
Hunter Biden’s legal team had hoped the pardon would effectively end his legal woes. Instead, the DOJ’s response makes it clear that they view the charges—stemming from years of alleged tax irregularities and a firearm purchase made while the younger Biden was reportedly struggling with substance abuse—as standing independent of any act of clemency.
The filing’s conclusion left no ambiguity: “For the foregoing reasons, the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment should be denied.”
This remarkable rejection puts Hunter Biden’s legal future back in the spotlight, raising questions about the durability of presidential pardons and their implications for politically sensitive cases. The Special Counsel’s resistance to the pardon reflects a broader concern over judicial independence, particularly in cases involving high-profile defendants with familial ties to the presidency.
For President Joe Biden, this legal drama intensifies scrutiny over his controversial decision to pardon his son, a move critics argue undermines the integrity of the justice system. As the legal wrangling continues, the case promises to have far-reaching implications for both the Biden family and the broader principles of justice in America.
For more see Kyle Becker’s tweet: